Sub-national Human Rights Institutions:a Definition and Typology

Human Rights Review 18 (1):87-109 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that independent governmental human rights bodies at the sub-national level now comprise a meaningful group that can be understood as a sub-national counterpart to National Human Rights Institutions. In accordance with the term’s growing usage among human rights practitioners, I label these bodies as “Sub-national Human Rights Institutions” (“SNHRIs”). So far, however, SNHRIs (as a general concept) have been the subject of very little academic attention, although there have been many studies of individual SNHRIs or particular types of SNHRIs. With the objective of promoting coherent and generalizable research into this relatively new institutional concept, in this paper I therefore stipulate and justify a general SNHRI definition and a scientific typology of SNHRIs based on administrative level, institutional form, and breadth of mandate.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

National human rights commissions in Asia.Sonia Cardenas - 2002 - Human Rights Review 4 (1):30-51.
In this issue.[author unknown] - 2000 - Human Rights Review 1 (3):3-5.
In this issue.[author unknown] - 2000 - Human Rights Review 1 (4):3-4.
In this issue.[author unknown] - 2001 - Human Rights Review 2 (2):3-4.
In this issue.[author unknown] - 2001 - Human Rights Review 2 (3):3-4.
In this issue.[author unknown] - 2000 - Human Rights Review 2 (1):3-6.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-30

Downloads
9 (#1,280,687)

6 months
2 (#1,259,919)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms.Lynn J. Frewer & Gene Rowe - 2005 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 30 (2):251-290.

Add more references