When Trust(s) is not Enough: An Argument for the use of Unjust Enrichment for Home-Sharers [Book Review]

Feminist Legal Studies 7 (1):47-62 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Right Does Unjust Enrichment Law Protect?Jennifer M. Nadler - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (2):245-275.
What is Unjust Enrichment?Charlie Webb - 2009 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2):215-243.
James Barr Ames and the Early Modern History of Unjust Enrichment.Andrew Kull - 2005 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25 (2):297-319.
Ignorance and Unjust Enrichment: The Problem of Title.William Swadling - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (4):627-658.
Correcting Unjust Enrichments.A. Simester - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (3):579-598.
Corrective justice.Ernest Joseph Weinrib - 2012 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
The Politics of Intellectual Self-trust.Karen Jones - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (2):237-251.
Reconsidering the Role of Election in Rescission.Elise Bant - 2012 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32 (3):467-486.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
31 (#513,288)

6 months
10 (#262,545)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Cohabitation and the Law Commission’s Project.Simone Wong - 2006 - Feminist Legal Studies 14 (2):145-166.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references