Normative coherence of philosophical discourse

Filosofska Dumka (Philosophical Thought) 5:21-28 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author of the article assumes that any human activity is normative. In the case of philosophical discourse, the normative ground is its indispensable condition, which makes it possible to compare the foundations of philosophy and other scientific disciplines. The norm (law) has, on the one hand, descriptive content related to the description of the noumenal world, and, on the other, prescriptive content related to the counterfactuality of what ought to be. The author emphasizes that the functional aspect of a norm is that it is a means of socially integrating the behavior of people and social groups into a whole. Due to the requirements and requirements of society, social groups are transformed into standards, models, standards of modal and obligatory behavior of the representatives of these groups, performing the function of motivation, orientation and legitimacy. In the second part of the article, the author focuses on a narrower understanding of discourse as speech, dialogue, discussions, which presuppose argumentation based on certain principles, rules, rules and regulations. This interpretation of discourse is peculiar to representatives of the ethics of discourse (K.-O. Apel, Y. Habermas, D. Böhler, V. Kulman, G. Gronke, etc.). Within ethics, principles, imperatives, rules, norms and guidelines both normalize the discourse and substantiate this discourse. Adherence to these principles, rules, norms, and guidelines ensures the normative coherence of discourse as the instance of consensus building on the basis of revealing the performative contradiction of the statement. The normative coherence of discourse is also the basis for its functioning as a meta-institution of justification of social (moral, legal) norms and legitimation of institutions of deliberative democracy in a society of communication and dialogical civilization. Summarizing, the author formulates generalized requirements-guidelines that make it possible to implement the principles, norms and rules of discourse as a meta-institutional instance of society.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Normative Discourse.Gianfrancesco Zanetti - 2016 - Ratio Juris 29 (1):44-58.
Normative Language in Context.Alex Silk - 2017 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 12.
Ontological infidelity.Patrick Dieveney - 2008 - Synthese 165 (1):1 - 12.
Taking Prudence Seriously.Guy Fletcher - 2019 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 14:70-94.
Convergence, Community, and Force in Aesthetic Discourse.Nick Riggle - 2021 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 8 (47).
Expressivism and Convention-Relativism about Epistemic Discourse.Allan Hazlett - forthcoming - In A. Fairweather & O. Flanagan (eds.), Naturalizing Epistemic Virtue. Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-10

Downloads
18 (#821,353)

6 months
10 (#257,636)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Reflexive Letztbegründung.Wolfgang Kuhlmann - 1986 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 40 (3):452-455.
Rekonstruktive Pragmatik.Dietrich Böhler - 1986 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 40 (4):644-648.

Add more references