Jung and Buddhism : a hermeneutical engagement with the Tibetan and Zen Buddhist traditions

Dissertation, University of Kent (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This thesis examines Jung's relation to Buddhism, in particular, the Tibetan and Zen Buddhist traditions from a hermeneutic perspective. It addresses the way Jung attempted to make a dialogue between Analytical Psychology and Buddhism and the extent to which he was successful. Jung's approach to Buddhism is sometimes affected by Eurocentric prejudices, which led him to misunderstand some of the concepts of Buddhism. Moreover, from the standpoint of a psychologist, Jung had a tendency to reduce Buddhist thought to its psychological aspects, and not to pay sufficient attention to its traditional meanings. Jung was also highly selective in his use of Buddhist texts and focussed on those texts which appeared to confirm, or conform to, his psychological thinking, but dismissed other Buddhist materials which had no common base with his psychology. To contrast his approach, this thesis examines the theory of the phenomenology of religion, which emphasises the recognition of the irreducibility of religious phenomena and claims that we must understand religion within its own cultural context. From the perspective of the phenomenology of religion, Jung's methodology lacks objectivity and fails to exercise epoche, which means a suspension of one's own judgement or the exclusion of every possible presupposition. Rather, Jung seems to over-emphasise eidetic vision, which is a form of subjectivity that implies an intuitive grasp of the essentials of a situation in its wholeness. There are important achievements in Jung's engagement with Buddhism and indeed Jung should be regarded as a pioneer in this field of research. Jung's writings on Buddhism had a major influence on later studies of the various Buddhist traditions and meditation in relation to Western psychology and its therapeutic techniques. From this more positive perspective, this thesis explores in detail the strengths and shortcomings of Jung's engagement with the different Buddhist traditions, in order to assess its potential contribution to the contemporary dialogue between East and West.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Jung in Contexts: A Reader.Paul Bishop (ed.) - 1999 - Routledge.
Jung in Contexts: A Reader.Paul Bishop (ed.) - 1999 - Routledge.
Engaging Buddhism: Why It Matters to Philosophy.Jay L. Garfield - 2015 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Buddhism: a contemporary philosophical investigation.Yahui Jiang Lee (ed.) - 2018 - Valley Cottage, NY, United States of America: Socialy Press, an imprint of Scitus Academics.
Jung and Mysticism.Lionel Corbett - 2018 - In Thomas Cattoi & David M. Odorisio (eds.), Depth Psychology and Mysticism. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 167-182.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-15

Downloads
3 (#1,729,579)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Orientalism.Edward Said - 1978 - Vintage.
Truth and Method.H. G. Gadamer - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (4):487-490.
India and Europe: An Essay in Understanding.Wilhelm Halbfass - 1988 - State University of New York Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references