Eemeren & Garssen's Controversy and Confrontation: Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory

Informal Logic 29 (4):449-479 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2010

DOI

10.22329/il.v29i4.2908

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Critical Notice of 'Controversy and Confrontation. Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory' by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen. [REVIEW]Maria Navarro - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (1):69-74.
Review of F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (eds) (2008). Controversy and Confrontation. Amsterdam: John Benjamis. [REVIEW]Frank Zenker - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (4):447-475.
Book Review ofControversy and Confrontation, Relating Controversy Analysis With Argumentation Theory. [REVIEW]Maria Navarro - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (1):69-74.
Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (eds): Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues. [REVIEW]Harry Weger - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):115-122.
Predicaments of Communication, Argument, and Power: Towards a Critical Theory of Controversy.G. Thomas Goodnight - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (2):119-137.
E. Feteris, B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds): Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics. In Honor of Frans H. van Eemeren. [REVIEW]Paul den Hoven - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):409-412.
E. Feteris, B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds): Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics. In Honor of Frans H. van Eemeren: John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 2011. [REVIEW]Paul van den Hoven - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):409-412.
Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research.Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):33-53.
Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):33-53.
Confrontation in conversations: The adjacency pair as a tool of the descriptive component of a Pragma-dialectical analysis. [REVIEW]Agnes Verbiest - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (4):395-400.
Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules: Springer, Dordrecht, 2009, Volume 16 of the Springer Argumentation Library. ISBN: 978-90-481-2613-2. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9. HB: $139.00.Dale Hample - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):375-381.
Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, David Godden & Gordon Mitchell (eds.) - 2011 - Rozenberg / Sic Sat.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
26 (#595,031)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frank Zenker
Nankai University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Progress and its problems: Towards a theory of scientific growth.L. Laudan - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (1):57-71.
Dynamics of Reason.Michael Friedman - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):702-712.
The Realm of Rhetoric.Ch Perelman & William Kluback - 1982 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 17 (4):240-242.
The Discourses of Science.Marcello Pera - 1994 - University of Chicago Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references