Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. How Should a Speech Recognizer Work?Odette Scharenborg, Dennis Norris, Louis ten Bosch & James M. McQueen - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (6):867-918.
    Although researchers studying human speech recognition (HSR) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) share a common interest in how information processing systems (human or machine) recognize spoken language, there is little communication between the two disciplines. We suggest that this lack of communication follows largely from the fact that research in these related fields has focused on the mechanics of how speech can be recognized. In Marr's (1982) terms, emphasis has been on the algorithmic and implementational levels rather than on the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • How Should a Speech Recognizer Work?Odette Scharenborg, Dennis Norris, Louis Bosch & James M. McQueen - 2005 - Cognitive Science 29 (6):867-918.
    Although researchers studying human speech recognition (HSR) and automatic speech recognition (ASR) share a common interest in how information processing systems (human or machine) recognize spoken language, there is little communication between the two disciplines. We suggest that this lack of communication follows largely from the fact that research in these related fields has focused on the mechanics of how speech can be recognized. In Marr's (1982) terms, emphasis has been on the algorithmic and implementational levels rather than on the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience.K. Onishi - 2002 - Cognition 83 (1):B13-B23.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition.Dennis Norris - 1994 - Cognition 52 (3):189-234.
  • Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary.Dennis Norris, James M. McQueen & Anne Cutler - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):299-325.
    Top-down feedback does not benefit speech recognition; on the contrary, it can hinder it. No experimental data imply that feedback loops are required for speech recognition. Feedback is accordingly unnecessary and spoken word recognition is modular. To defend this thesis, we analyse lexical involvement in phonemic decision making. TRACE (McClelland & Elman 1986), a model with feedback from the lexicon to prelexical processes, is unable to account for all the available data on phonemic decision making. The modular Race model (Cutler (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations  
  • "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model.Douglas L. Hintzman - 1986 - Psychological Review 93 (4):411-428.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   209 citations  
  • Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.Stephen D. Goldinger - 1998 - Psychological Review 105 (2):251-279.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   121 citations