Prenatal Drug Use: Legal and Ethical Considerations and the Role of Health Providers in Addressing the Problem

Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Drug use by pregnant women is a source of legal and ethical controversy about the nature of a woman's obligations to her fetus, the state's role in controlling pregnant women's behavior, and the obligations of health professionals toward drug-involved women, their fetuses, and their newborns. Unresolved policy issues include whether or under what conditions pregnant women or their newborns should be drug tested, how information about drug-involvement should be used, and whether or under what conditions the legal system should be engaged. ;Because more than 99% of women deliver in hospitals, health providers are uniquely situated to play a key role in implementing policies for drug-involved pregnant women and their newborns. Unfortunately, little is known about hospital policies and physician practices related to prenatal drug use. ;This study aims to fill this gap. After developing key legal and ethical issues, this report describes a survey of 1,321 health professionals in 269 hospitals designed toward two purposes. First, the survey documents the policies and practices for identifying and intervening in cases of drug-involved pregnant women. Secondly, the survey explores the attitudes of health professionals toward a range of medical and legal options for controlling such drug use. ;Results indicate hospitals tend not to have a clear measure of drug use among their patients or a strategy for addressing it. Fewer than 30% of hospitals had anonymously tested pregnant women or their newborns for drugs. More common was to drug test pregnant women or their newborns based on risk factors. Only 30% reported written policies for drug testing. Also uncommon was obtaining consent to drug test; only 26% reported obtaining consent to test pregnant women. Even fewer, 8.5%, reported obtaining parental consent to test newborns. ;Written intervention policies were more common. Although engagement of the legal system was reported to be rare, provider attitudes were remarkably favorable toward it. Approximately 40% consistently approved the use of criminal sanctions for drug-involved pregnant women. Forty-four percent approved mandating Norplant for continued drug use. Criminal sanctions, however, are matched with high percentages in strong opposition. ;Virtually all respondents indicated a desire for hospitals policies and practice guidelines

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Misguided Retribution: The Criminalization of Pregnant Women Who Take Drugs.Vicki Toscano - 2002 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
Drugs, Money, and Power: The Canadian Drug Shortage.Chris Kaposy - 2014 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (1):85-89.
Public Policy Regarding Pregnant Substance Abusers: The Rise of Fetal Rights.Gretchen Margaret-Elisabeth Aumann - 1998 - Dissertation, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Galveston
生命的哲学 ‐后基因时代药物筛选策略与传统中药学理论.Xiao Ming Wang - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 44:139-142.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references