Methods in bioethics: the way we reason now

New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress & Matthew Adams (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Principlism : the Borg of bioethics -- A common morality for hedgehogs : Bernard Gert -- Getting down to cases : the revival of casuistry in bioethics -- Nice story but so what : narrative and justification in ethics -- Dewey and Rorty's pragmatism and bioethics -- Freestanding pragmatism in bioethics and law -- A method in search of a purpose : the internal morality of medicine -- Method to rule them all? Reflective equilibrium in bioethics -- Concluding reflections : method in bioethics : the very idea.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Call number

R724.A727 2017

ISBN(s)

9780190665982   019066598X

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Bioethical Principles in Clinical Medicine.Rudolf Novotný & Zuzana Novotná - 2014 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 4 (1-2):67-72.
Public Reason as the Way for Dialogue.Hon-Lam Li - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (12):29-31.
Metodologia bioetyki.Barbara Chyrowicz - 2014 - Diametros 42:1-28.
Digital bioethics: introducing new methods for the study of bioethical issues.Manuel Schneider, Effy Vayena & Alessandro Blasimme - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (11):783-790.
Medical and nursing students' television viewing habits: Potential implications for bioethics.Matthew J. Czarny, Ruth R. Faden, Marie T. Nolan, Edwin Bodensiek & Jeremy Sugarman - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):1 – 8.
Commentary: A Consensus about “Consensus”?Mark P. Aulisio & Robert M. Arnold - 1999 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 27 (4):328-331.
The many metaphysical commitments of secular clinical ethics: Expanding the argument for a moral–metaphysical proceduralism.Abram Brummett & Jason T. Eberl - 2022 - Bioethics 36 (7):783-793.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Medical and Nursing Students' Television Viewing Habits: Potential Implications for Bioethics”.Matthew Czarny, Ruth Faden, Marie Nolan, Edwin Bodensiek & Jeremy Sugarman - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12):1-1.
Commentary: A Consensus About "Consensus"?Mark P. Aulisio & Robert M. Arnold - 1999 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 27 (4):328-331.
Commentary: A Consensus about “Consensus”?Mark P. Aulisio & Robert M. Arnold - 1999 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 27 (4):328-331.
Pragmatic Bioethics.S. Holland - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):e9-e9.
The quality of bioethics debate: implications for clinical ethics committees.L. Williamson - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):357-360.
On the Rise and Importance of Bioethics. E. Smolková - 2005 - Filozofia 60:668-681.
On the rise and importance of bioethics.E. Smolkova - 2005 - Filozofia 60 (9):668-681.
Feminist bioethics: at the center, on the margins.Jackie Leach Scully, Laurel Baldwin-Ragaven & Petya Fitzpatrick (eds.) - 2010 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-10

Downloads
26 (#605,520)

6 months
15 (#162,953)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Theory and bioethics.John Arras - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references