We have always been transgenic

AI and Society 20 (1):35-48 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This dialogue concerns the nature of ethical responsibility in contemporary art practice, and its relation to questions of creativity; the role of writing in shaping the perception of transgenic art and related practices; and the problems that may be associated with trusting artists to act with integrity in the unchartered waters of their enthusiastic engagement with genetic technologies

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Assessing the value of transgenic crops.Hugh Lacey - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):497-511.
Transgenic organisms and the failure of a free market argument.D. R. Cooley - 2004 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 13 (4):354-371.
“The moral difference between intragenic and transgenic modification of plants”.Bjørn K. Myskja - 2006 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (3):225-238.
New Images from Life: Virtual Reality, Genetic and Transgenic Art.Oliver Grau - 2000 - Art Inquiry. Recherches Sur les Arts 2:7-26.
Patenting and Transgenic Organisms.Jim Wishloff - 2003 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 6 (3):176-180.
Patenting and Transgenic Organisms.Keekok Lee - 2003 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 6 (3):166-175.
Dolly: a New Form of Transgenic Breedwealth.Sarah Franklin - 1997 - Environmental Values 6 (4):427 - 437.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-20

Downloads
51 (#310,076)

6 months
5 (#627,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations