Volume I: Recovery operators in logics of formal inconsistency

Logic Journal of the IGPL 28 (5):615-623 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are a considerable number of logics that do not seem to share the same inferential principles. Intuitionistic logics do not include the law of the exclude.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On discourses addressed by infidel logicians.Walter Carnielli & Marcelo E. Coniglio - 2013 - In Francesco Berto, Edwin Mares, Koji Tanaka & Francesco Paoli (eds.), Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications. Springer. pp. 27--41.
Two-valued weak Kleene logics.Bruno da Ré & Damian Szmuc - 2019 - Manuscrito 42 (1):1-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-26

Downloads
15 (#943,292)

6 months
5 (#628,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Eduardo Alejandro Barrio
Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
Walter Carnielli
University of Campinas

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Paradoxes and Failures of Cut.David Ripley - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (1):139 - 164.
On the theory of inconsistent formal systems.Newton C. A. Costa - 1972 - Recife,: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Instituto de Matemática.
On the theory of inconsistent formal systems.Newton C. A. da Costa - 1974 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15 (4):497-510.

View all 19 references / Add more references