- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Agreeing to differ: modeling persuasive dialogue between parties without consensus about values
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Agreeing to Differ: Modelling Persuasive Dialogue Between Parties With Different Values.Chris Reed - 2002 - Informal Logic 22 (3).
Consensus of expertise: The role of consensus of experts in formulating public policy and estimating facts.Robert M. Veatch - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):427-445.
Differences in moral values between corporations.Paul C. Nystrom - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (12):971 - 979.
Democracy by Consensus: Some Conceptual Considerations.Kwasi Wiredu - 2001 - Philosophical Papers 30 (3):227-244.
Try to see it my way: Modelling persuasion in legal discourse. [REVIEW]Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (4):271-287.
Agreeing to Differ: African Democracy--- Its Obstacles and ProspectsDenied?Steven Friedman - 1999 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 66 (3).
Persuasive Definitions: Values, Meanings and Implicit Disagreements.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (3):203-228.
Persuasive argumentation in negotiation.Katia P. Sycara - 1990 - Theory and Decision 28 (3):203-242.
Social network structure and the achievement of consensus.Kevin J. S. Zollman - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (1):26-44.
Analysis, modeling, and the management of international negotiations.Dhanesh K. Samarasan - 1993 - Theory and Decision 34 (3):275-291.
Overlapping Consensus” on “Overlapping Consensus.Tong Shijun - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Research 37 (9999):29-45.
Rationality as a Common Public Domain.Piotr Balcerowicz - 2011 - Dialogue and Universalism 21 (1):73-94.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-18
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2014-01-18
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
Practical Reasoning Arguments: A Modular Approach.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (4):519-547.
Distinctive features of persuasion and deliberation dialogues.Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon & Douglas Walton - 2013 - Argument and Computation 4 (2):105-127.
The Argumentative Structure of Persuasive Definitions.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (5):525-549.
Teleological Justification of Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton & Giovanni Sartor - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):111-142.
Rhetorical figures, arguments, computation.Randy Allen Harris & Chrysanne Di Marco - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):211-231.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-rskd8 uwo