To Speak as a Judge: Difference, Voice and Power

Routledge (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

First published in 1999, this volume explores the nature of adjudication in the common law tradition from a feminist postmodernist perspective. The author accepts and celebrates the 'choices' open to the judge and argues that without choice, judgment cannot be properly judicial. The first full length feminist exploration of the role of the judge and the nature of law and legality, To Speak as a Judge is grounded in the process of adjudication and its rhetorical nature. It draws upon significant contemporary cases to explore the narrativity of law and the ways in which rhetoric and judicial understandings of the nature of law determine narrative style.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Feminist phenomenological voices.Linda Fisher - 2010 - Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):83-95.
Stories That Free Us.Hilde Lindemann - 2021 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 14 (2):1-10.
La legitimidad del juez constitucional.José Jiménez Sánchez - 2020 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 36:303-327.
Identity as the Difference of Power and the Differing from Being.Uljana Akca - 2017 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 9 (1):300-320.
The voice of conscience in Rousseau's Emile.Zdenko Kodelja - 2015 - Ethics and Education 10 (2):198-208.
Emerson, l’éducation et la démocratie.Sandra Laugier - 2010 - Etica E Politica 12 (1):157-180.
Heidegger and ontological difference.Loy M. Vail - 1972 - University Park,: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-20

Downloads
7 (#1,407,939)

6 months
6 (#582,229)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?