Abortion policies at the bedside: a response

Journal of Medical Ethics 1 (12):852-853 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hersey et al have outlined a proposed ethical framework for assessing abortion policies that locates the effect of government legislation between the provider and the patient, emphasising its influence on interactions between them. They claim that their framework offers an alternative to the personal moral claims that lie behind legislation restricting abortion access. However, they fail to observe that their own understanding of reproductive justice and the principles of medical ethics are similarly predicated on their individual moral beliefs. Consequently, the conclusions obtained from their framework are also derived from their individual beliefs, and have no claim to being objective.

Similar books and articles

Abortion, society, and the law.David F. Walbert - 1973 - Cleveland [Ohio]: Press of Case Western Reserve University. Edited by J. Douglas Butler.
The moral significance of spontaneous abortion.T. F. Murphy - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (2):79-83.
Abortion Policy and the Argument from Uncertainty.Raymond S. Pfeiffer - 1985 - Social Theory and Practice 11 (3):371-386.
Improving Abortion Access in Canada.Chris Kaposy - 2010 - Health Care Analysis 18 (1):17-34.
Chemical Abortion in Australia.Marcia Riordan - 2009 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 15 (2):6.
Abortion, Christianity, and Consistency.Richard Schoenig - 1998 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 5 (1):32-37.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-13

Downloads
146 (#129,022)

6 months
146 (#23,889)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bruce P. Blackshaw
University of Birmingham

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations