National priority regions (1971–2022): Redistribution, development and settlement

Theoretical Inquiries in Law 24 (2):267-290 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

National Priority Regions (NPRs) are one of Israel’s most robust tools for redistribution: a resource allocation governmental plan that favors some regions over others, mostly according to their socioeconomic status and peripherality. Drawing on archival research, this article is the first to focus on this topic and provide a detailed description and analysis of this measure. It provides historical and theoretical accounts of NPRs, tracing their history, starting in the 1970s, over three periods and showing how they have been used and abused. This allows for some important observations about the stakes of using a "color-blind" place-based distributive mechanism, and about the complex relationship between redistribution, development, and settlement. At the national level, this article shows how NPRs changed over the years from a discriminatory tool that excluded almost all Palestinian-Arab localities into a more inclusionary mechanism, but one that also works to support and incentivize Jewish settlement in the Occupied West Bank. At the theoretical level, this article lends itself to and supports a ‘region-skeptic’ approach that sees the regional scale, much like other seemingly “race-neutral” criteria, mostly as an elusive exercise of power that often deepens inequality. However, drawing on Israel’s experience with NPRs, this article provides some more specific cautionary tales that can, I suggest, work to improve the regional scale rather than eliminate it altogether.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Hardest of All the Problems.Daniel Kuehn - 2022 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 15 (1).
Redistribution and self-ownership.Dan Moller - 2019 - Social Philosophy and Policy 36 (2):196-211.
Egalitarianism: Is leximin the only option?Bertil Tungodden - 2000 - Economics and Philosophy 16 (2):229-245.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-22

Downloads
7 (#1,377,350)

6 months
3 (#974,323)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references