Aristotle on predication and demonstration

Manuscrito 42 (4):85-121 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue against the standard interpretation of Aristotle’s account of ‘natural predication’ in Posterior Analytics 1.19 and 1.22 according to which only substances can serve as subjects in such predications. I argue that this interpretation cannot accommodate a number of demonstrations Aristotle sanctions. I propose a new interpretation that can accommodate them.

Similar books and articles

Signs and demonstration in Aristotle.Francesco Bellucci - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (3):410-428.
Aristotle on exceptions to essences in biology.Petter Sandstad - 2016 - In Benedikt Strobel & Georg Wöhrle (eds.), Angewandte Epistemologie in antiker Philosophie und Wissenschaft, AKAN-Einzelschriften 11. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier. pp. 69-92.
The man without properties.Boris Hennig - 2017 - Synthese 194 (6).
To Be in a Subject and Accident.José Miguel Gambra - 2015 - Vivarium 53 (2-4):170-193.
Virtuous Circles.Aldo Antonelli - 2000 - In Anil Gupta & Andre Chapuis (eds.), Circularity, Definition, and Truth. Indian Council of Philosophical Research.
Forms and Predication Reconsidered.Anne M. Wiles - 2014 - Studia Gilsoniana 3:241–256.
Essence, Necessity, and Demonstration in Aristotle.David Bronstein - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90 (3):724-732.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-21

Downloads
404 (#49,601)

6 months
83 (#57,343)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Bronstein
University of Notre Dame Australia

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Aristotle and Logical Theory.Jonathan Lear - 1980 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Aristotle on Predication.D. W. Hamlyn - 1961 - Phronesis 6 (1):110-126.

View all 8 references / Add more references