Graduate studies at Western
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (2):181-189 (2002)
|Abstract||Inequities in health and health care are one of the greatest challenges facing the international community today. This problem raises serious questions for health care planners, politicians and ethicists alike. The major world religions can play an important role in this discussion. Therefore, interreligious dialogue on this topic between ethicists and health care professionals is of increasing relevance and urgency. This article gives an overview on the positions of Islam and Christianity on equity and the distribution of resources in health care. It has been written in close collaboration and constant dialogue between the two authors coming from the two religions. Although there is no specific concept for the modern term equity in either of the two religions, several areas of agreement have been identified: All human beings share the same values and status, which constitutes the basis for an equitable distribution of rights and benefits. Special provisions need to be made for the most needy and disadvantaged. The obligation to provide equitable health services extends beyond national and religious boundaries. Several areas require intensified research and further dialogue: the relationship between the individual and the community interms of rights and responsibilities, how to operationalize the moral duty to decrease global inequalities in health, and the understanding and interpretation of human rights in regard to social services|
|Keywords||christianity distribution of health care resources equity interreligious dialogue Islam|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Helen Keasberry (1992). Equity and Solidarity: The Context of Health Care in the Netherlands. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (4):463-477.
Gavin Mooney (2000). Vertical Equity in Health Care Resource Allocation. Health Care Analysis 8 (3):203-215.
Larry R. Churchill (1999). The United States Health Care System Under Managed Care: How the Commodification of Health Care Distorts Ethics and Threatens Equity. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 7 (4):393-411.
Chan Ho-mun (1999). Free Choice, Equity, and Care: The Moral Foundations of Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (6):624 – 637.
Megan Black & Gavin Mooney (2002). Equity in Health Care From a Communitarian Standpoint. Health Care Analysis 10 (2):193-208.
Madison Powers (1997). Managed Care: How Economic Incentive Reforms Went Wrong. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):353-360.
T. M. Wilkinson (2010). Community, Public Health and Resource Allocation. Public Health Ethics 3 (3):267-271.
Dan W. Brock (2000). Broadening the Bioethics Agenda. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (1):21-38.
Julia Tao Lai Po-wah (1999). Does It Really Care? The Harvard Report on Health Care Reform for Hong Kong. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (6):571 – 590.
Dan W. Brock (2001). Children's Rights to Health Care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (2):163 – 177.
Elliot N. Dorff (1997). Paying for Medical Care: A Jewish View. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (1):15-30.
Ren-Zong Qiu (1989). Equity and Public Health Care in China. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):283-287.
Gavin Mooney (1989). The Demand for Effectiveness, Efficiency and Equity of Health Care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (3).
Benjamin Sachs (2008). The Liberty Principle and Universal Health Care. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (2):pp. 149-172.
Erik Gustavsson (forthcoming). From Needs to Health Care Needs. Health Care Analysis:1-14.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads5 ( #170,048 of 723,067 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 723,067 )
How can I increase my downloads?