The Combined Effect of Motion and Lightness Contrast on Anomalous Transparency

Gestalt Theory 44 (1-2):147-160 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Summary We report an effect of anomalous transparency that is similar to other phantom effects. In an experiment aimed at testing the combined role of motion of the occluding surface and lightness contrast and polarity on the perception of anomalous transparency, we found that transparency is perceived only with low contrast, and enhanced when the occluding surface is moving. A tentative explanation is suggested, based on simultaneous lightness contrast as a segregation factor and on motion as an integration factor, and discussed in light of previous studies conducted in the theoretical framework of Gestalt theories in perception.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lightness contrast and failures of lightness constancy-a common explanation.Al Gilchrist - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (5):349-349.
Effect of lightness contrast on Ponzo illusions.Ted Jaeger, Frank Treiber & Robert H. Pollack - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (1):1-4.
Is Seeing-In a Transparency Effect?Michael Newall - 2015 - British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (2):131-156.
Weight and lightness in Aristotle and his predecessors.David E. Hahm - 1976 - In Peter K. Machamer & Robert G. Turnbull (eds.), Motion and Time, Space and Matter. Ohio State University Press. pp. 56--82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-12

Downloads
8 (#1,323,642)

6 months
4 (#798,550)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Principles of Gestalt Psychology.K. Koffka - 1936 - Philosophy 11 (44):502-504.
Toward a perceptual theory of transparency.Manish Singh & Barton L. Anderson - 2002 - Psychological Review 109 (3):492-519.

Add more references