Science, values and objectivity

Science & Education 11 (2):191-202 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Science, Values, and Objectivity.Peter K. Machamer & Gereon Wolters (eds.) - 2004 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Can scientists be objective?Malcolm Williams - 2006 - Social Epistemology 20 (2):163 – 180.
The Objectivity of Values: Invariance without Explanation.Aaron James - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (4):581-605.
On the Objectivity of Facts, Beliefs, and Values.Wolfgang Spohn - 2004 - In Peter K. Machamer & Gereon Wolters (eds.), Science, Values, and Objectivity. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 172.
"Social" objectivity and the objectivity of value.Tara Smith - 2004 - In Peter K. Machamer & Gereon Wolters (eds.), Science, Values, and Objectivity. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 143--171.
Feminist Philosophy of Science: Values and Objectivity.Sharon Crasnow - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (4):413-423.
Non-Cognitive Values and Objectivity in Scientific Explanation: Egalitarianism and the Case of the Movius Line.Raoul Gervais - 2013 - Perspectives on Science 21 (4):429-452.
Between Science and Values.Peter Weingart - 2004 - In Peter K. Machamer & Gereon Wolters (eds.), Science, Values, and Objectivity. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 112.
Four Contributions Values Can Make to the Objectivity of Social Science.Sandra G. Harding - 1978 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:199 - 209.
Value-Free Science: Ideals and Illusions?Harold Kincaid, John Dupré & Alison Wylie (eds.) - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A Case Study in Objectifying Values in Science.Mark A. Bedau - 2004 - In Peter K. Machamer & Gereon Wolters (eds.), Science, Values, and Objectivity. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 190.
Epistemic and nonepistemic values in science.Mauro Dorato - 2004 - In Peter K. Machamer & Gereon Wolters (eds.), Science, Values, and Objectivity. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 52--77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-21

Downloads
33 (#480,801)

6 months
4 (#779,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Should the sociology of science be rated X?Douglas Allchin - 2004 - Science Education 88 (6):934-946.
Discussion.Peter Davson-Galle - 2003 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 22 (6):475-485.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Cognitive and social values.Peter Machamer & Heather Douglas - 1999 - Science & Education 8 (1):45-54.
Scientific understanding and the control of nature.Hugh Lacey - 1999 - Science & Education 8 (1):13-35.
A natural alliance of teaching and philosophy of science.Peter B. Sloep & Wim J. van der Steen - 1988 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 20 (2):24–32.
Philosophy of Science and School Science.P. Davson‐Galle - 1994 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 26 (1):34-53.

Add more references