A Unified Model of the Division of Cognitive Labor

Philosophy of Science 81 (3):444-459 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Current theories of the division of cognitive labor are confined to the “context of justification,” assuming exogenous theories. But new theories are made from the same labor that is used for developing existing theories, and if none of this labor is ever allocated to create new alternatives, then scientific progress is impossible. A unified model is proposed in which theories are no longer given but a function of the division of labor in the model itself. The interactions of individuals balancing the exploitation of existing theories and the exploration of new theories results in a robust cyclical pattern

Similar books and articles

Analytical Marxism and the Division of Labor.Renzo Llorente - 2006 - Science and Society 70 (2):232 - 251.
Self Organization and Adaptation in Insect Societies.Robert E. Page & Sandra D. Mitchell - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:289 - 298.
From the organization to the division of cognitive labor.Fred D'Agostino - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (1):101-129.
Pluralism in Political Corporate Social Responsibility.Jukka Mäkinen & Arno Kourula - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (4):649-678.
Labor as the Basis for Intellectual Property Rights.Bryan Cwik - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):681-695.
Unified Theories and Unified Science.Robert L. Causey - 1974 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1974:3 - 13.
The division of cognitive labor.Philip Kitcher - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):5-22.
The Division of Epistemic Labor.Sandy Goldberg - 2011 - Episteme 8 (1):112-125.
Diversity and the Division of Cognitive Labor.Ryan Muldoon - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (2):117-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-21

Downloads
732 (#21,967)

6 months
116 (#35,203)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rogier De Langhe
Tilburg University

Citations of this work

Pursuit and inquisitive reasons.Will Fleisher - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 94 (C):17-30.
The Epistemic Division of Labor Revisited.Johanna Thoma - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (3):454-472.
Value of cognitive diversity in science.Samuli Pöyhönen - 2017 - Synthese 194 (11):4519-4540.
Permissive Metaepistemology.David Thorstad - 2019 - Mind 128 (511):907-926.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The division of cognitive labor.Philip Kitcher - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):5-22.
The Role of the Priority Rule in Science.Michael Strevens - 2003 - Journal of Philosophy 100 (2):55-79.
Science and Values.Harold I. Brown & Larry Laudan - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (3):439.

Add more references