Forgotten Distinctions in the Critique of Radical Constructivism
Abstract
Open peer commentary on the target article “Arguments Opposing the Radicalism of Radical Constructivism” by Gernot Saalmann. First paragraph: Gernot Saalmann applauds radical constructivism’s use of human constructs “to understand the foreign,” but bemoans its refusal to accept any additional claim that these may “correspond with reality” . The author seems to forget, unfortunately, that the refusal was meant to solve a problem – that of the absence of an observed referent in social research. His plea for a replacement by “critical realism” does not deal with that problem, and thus falls flat