Countering the counting problem: A reply to Holton
Analysis 56 (4):239–245 (1996)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesSteven Savitt (1972). I-Counting is Counting. Philosophy of Science 39 (1):72-73.
Dylan Dodd (2009). Weakness of Will as Intention-Violation. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):45-59.
Peter J. Lewis (2003). Counting Marbles: A Reply to Critics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (1):165-170.
Yaroslav Sergeyev (2010). Counting Systems and the First Hilbert Problem. Nonlinear Analysis Series A 72 (3-4):1701-1708.
Richard Holton (1995). Sources and Leapfrogging: Reply to Pickles. Mind 104 (415):583 - 584.
Richard Holton (1995). Leapfrogging and Scope: Reply to Pickles. Mind 104 (415):583-584.
Ralph Wedgwood (2010). The Nature of Normativity: Reply to Holton, Railton, and Lenman. Philosophical Studies 151 (3):479-491.
Richard Holton (1996). Davidson, Mcfetridge, and the Counting Problem. Analysis 56 (1):46–50.
Ian Rumfitt (1996). The Vagaries of Paraphrase: A Reply to Holton on the Counting Problem. Analysis 56 (4):246–250.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #201,781 of 549,037 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
