After “40 Cases”

Vivarium 61 (3-4):245-287 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article documents how a serial plagiarism case discovered over a decade ago continues to generate negative effects in the downstream research on medieval and early modern philosophy. The ongoing positive citation of the 40 plagiarizing articles and book chapters – including those retracted by their publishers – affects the reliability of later scholarship in several ways. The present state of affairs is the joint result of authors, editors, peer reviewers, and publishers who continue to allow (and in some cases, support) the publication of new works across a variety of genres that contain positive citations to the 40 plagiarizing articles and book chapters. The problem shows no signs of abating; the plagiarizing articles and book chapters continue to acquire positive citations in new publications, including authoritative reference works. The breach of research standards is further shown by the fact that even a non-existent publication by the plagiarist continues to acquire positive citations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is intellectual history?Richard Whatmore - 2015 - Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Two Possible Sources for Pico's Oratio. Dougherty - 2002 - Vivarium 40 (2):219-241.
Introduction.Chris Schabel & William Duba - 2009 - Vivarium 47 (2-3):147-163.
In Memoriam Simo Knuuttila.Mikko Yrjönsuuri - 2022 - Vivarium 60 (4):271-272.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-26

Downloads
15 (#929,240)

6 months
15 (#159,740)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?