Symbolizing an Infinite World – Kant’s Analytic of Aesthetic Judgment, its Transcultural Dimension, and Jullien’s Critique of its Limits

Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy 2018 (3):7-22 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

AbstractKant’s formal conditions for aesthetic judgment do not limit aesthetic reflection to certain aesthetic traditions and cultures. Moreover, these conditions open up the possibility of applying aesthetic reflection in the context of different approaches. From this perspective, Kant’s analytic of aesthetic judgment might furnish a useful basis for trans-cultural dialogues in the field of aesthetics and reflection on the arts. Yet the theory also has its limits, especially insofar as it neglects the somatic dimension of aesthetic experience. These two questions are the primary concerns of the paper.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant’s Aesthetic Epistemology: Form and World. [REVIEW]Lara Ostaric - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (1):pp. 147-148.
Aesthetics is the grammar of desire.Jennifer A. McMahon - 2015 - Aesthetic Investigations 1 (1):156-164.
Kant and the Claims of Taste. [REVIEW]R. H. - 1979 - Review of Metaphysics 33 (2):430-432.
Critical Aesthetic Realism.Jennifer A. McMahon - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (2):49-69.
Kant's Aesthetic Revolution.Albert Hofstadter - 1975 - Journal of Religious Ethics 3 (2):171 - 191.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-15

Downloads
17 (#865,183)

6 months
3 (#965,065)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Kant-Bibliographie 2018.Margit Ruffing - 2020 - Kant Studien 111 (4):647-702.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references