Essay on Nature's Semeiosos
Journal of Philosophical Research 20:297-348 (1995)
| Abstract | In this two-part essay I develop a theory of natural signs. Since even primordial signs signify values, in the first part I develop the theory’s valuative aspect. Goods are as primary in nature as facts are, and together facts and values generate semeiosis in all life without excess extrapolation from human psychology. To ward off over-extrapolating on values, I defend a major discontinuity between man and nature on the goods of ethics. In the essay’s second part I develop the semeiotic dimensions of the negative feedback model of purposive systems. I provide tests for the truth and falsity of the primitive representations in these systems. I account for the holism of representational systems and their non-extensionality, and I define functions. I solve this important definitional problem by inverting the usual mode of thinking: Functions do not explain signs; signs explain functions. Finally I defend this theory’s way of understanding the continuity between human beings and the rest of living nature against several criticisms | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,711 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesArthur E. Falk (1981). Purpose, Feedback, and Evolution. Philosophy of Science 48 (2):198-217.
Theodore R. Schatzki (2000). The Social Bearing of Nature. Inquiry 43 (1):21 – 37.
Terrell Ward Bynum (2006). Flourishing Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4).
Robert S. Corrington (2000). A Semiotic Theory of Theology and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
John Russell Roberts (2012). Whichcote and the Cambridge Platonists on Human Nature: An Interpretation and Defense. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy VI.
Glenn Parsons (2004). Natural Functions and the Aesthetic Appreciation of Inorganic Nature. British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):44-56.
H. O. Mounce (2008). Nature and Ethics. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (2):155-164.
H. O. Mounce (2008). Nature and Ethics. International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (2):155-164.
Rolston (1981). Values in Nature. Environmental Ethics 3 (2):113-128.
James M. Humber (1987). Sexual Perversion and Human Nature. Philosophy Research Archives 13:331-350.
Iii Holmes Rolston (1981). Values in Nature. Environmental Ethics 3 (2):113-128.
R. S. Peters (ed.) (1975). Nature and Conduct. St. Martin's Press.
Inna Semetsky (2006). The Language of Signs: Semiosis and the Memories of the Future. Sophia 45 (1).
Keith Allen (2010). Locke and the Nature of Ideas. Archiv fur Geschishte der Philosophie 92 (3):236-255.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-12-02Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
