Graduate studies at Western
Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (4):401-446 (2000)
|Abstract||Part of the ambiguity lies in the various points of view from which this question might be considered. The crudest di erence lies between the point of view of the working mathematician and that of the logician concerned with the foundations of mathematics. Now some of my fellow mathematical logicians might protest this distinction, since they consider themselves to be just more of those \working mathematicians". Certainly, modern logic has established itself as a very respectable branch of mathematics, and there are quite a few highly technical journals in logic, such as The Journal of Sym-|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Penelope Maddy (1991). Philosophy of Mathematics: Prospects for the 1990s. Synthese 88 (2):155 - 164.
Solomon Feferman, Presentation to the Panel, “Does Mathematics Need New Axioms?” Asl 2000 Meeting, Urbana Il, June 5, 2000.
Penelope J. Maddy (2001). Some Naturalistic Reflections on Set Theoretic Method. Topoi 20 (1):17-27.
Penelope Maddy (1990). Realism in Mathematics. Oxford University Prress.
Penelope Maddy (2011). Defending the Axioms: On the Philosophical Foundations of Set Theory. Oxford University Press.
Kenny Easwaran (2008). The Role of Axioms in Mathematics. Erkenntnis 68 (3):381 - 391.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #44,849 of 735,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,269 of 735,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?