Automatically selecting and using primary effects in planning: theory and experiments

&
Artificial Intelligence 89 (1-2):285-315 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/s0004-3702(96)00020-3

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Computational motor planning and the theory of event coding.David A. Rosenbaum - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):902-903.
The planning illusion: does active planning of a learning route support learning as well as learners think it does?Wilco J. Bonestroo & Ton de Jong - 2012 - Educational Studies 38 (5):559-571.
Automatic Learning of Proof Methods in Proof Planning.Mateja Jamnik, Manfred Kerber, Martin Pollet & Christoph Benzmüller - 2003 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 11 (6):647-673.
Effects of amount, rate, and stage of automatically-paced training on self-paced performance.Charles O. Nystrom, Robert E. Morin & David A. Grant - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 (4):225.
Do movement planning and control represent independent modules?Valérie Gaveau & Michel Desmurget - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):35-36.
The practice of mind: Theory, simulation or primary interaction?Shaun Gallagher - 2001 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 8 (5-7):83-108.
The role of the primary effect in the assessment of intentionality and morality.Michael Waldmann - forthcoming - Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
A theory of conflict resolution in planning.Qiang Yang - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence 58 (1-3):361-392.
Automatically generating abstractions for planning.Craig A. Knoblock - 1994 - Artificial Intelligence 68 (2):243-302.
Are Automatic Conceptual Cores the Gold Standard of Semantic Processing? The Context‐Dependence of Spatial Meaning in Grounded Congruency Effects.Lauren A. M. Lebois, Christine D. Wilson-Mendenhall & Lawrence W. Barsalou - 2015 - Cognitive Science 39 (8):1764-1801.
Planning as refinement search: a unified framework for evaluating design tradeoffs in partial-order planning.Subbarao Kambhampati, Craig A. Knoblock & Qiang Yang - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence 76 (1-2):167-238.
Planning Theory.Philip Allmendinger - 2009 - Palgrave.
Thought experiments in aesthetics.Paisley Nathan Livingston & Carl Mikael Pettersson - 2016 - In Kasper Lippert‐Rasmussen, Kimberley Brownlee & David Coady (eds.), A Companion to Applied Philosophy. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 501–513.
Soviet Planning in Theory and Practice. From Marxist Economics to the Command System.Giovanni Cadioli - 2020 - Scienza and Politica. Per Una Storia Delle Dottrine 31 (62).
Planning differences for chromaticity- and luminance-defined stimuli: A possible problem for Glover's planning–control model.Charles E. Wright & Charles Chubb - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):55-56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-22

Downloads
5 (#1,536,375)

6 months
3 (#965,065)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Planning for conjunctive goals.David Chapman - 1987 - Artificial Intelligence 32 (3):333-377.
Automatically generating abstractions for planning.Craig A. Knoblock - 1994 - Artificial Intelligence 68 (2):243-302.
Partial-order planning.Anthony Barrett & Daniel S. Weld - 1994 - Artificial Intelligence 67 (1):71-112.

Add more references