Exploring the role of the research integrity officer: Commentary on ‘seven ways to plagiarize: Handling real allegations of research misconduct’ (M. C. Loui) [Book Review]

Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):540-542 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11948-002-0006-5

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Seven ways to plagiarize: Handling real allegations of research misconduct.Michael C. Loui - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):529-539.
Exploring the role of the research integrity officer: Commentary on ‘seven ways to plagiarize: Handling real allegations of research misconduct’.Lisa N. Geller - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):540-542.
Self-plagiarism and dual and redundant publications: What is the problem?: Commentary on ‘seven ways to plagiarize: Handling real allegations of research misconduct’ (M. C. Loui). [REVIEW]Stephanie J. Bird - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4):543-544.
Assessing the Preparedness of Research Integrity Officers (RIOs) to Appropriately Handle Possible Research Misconduct Cases.Arthur J. Bonito, Sandra L. Titus & David E. Wright - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):605-619.
The Essential Need for Research Misconduct Allegation Audits.Lisa Loikith & Robert Bauchwitz - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (4):1027-1049.
The american experience: Lessons learned. [REVIEW]Lawrence J. Rhoades - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):95-107.
Closing the barn door: Coping with findings of research misconduct by trainees in the biomedical sciences.Barbara K. Redman & Arthur L. Caplan - 2015 - Research Ethics 11 (3):124-132.
Research Integrity in Greater China: Surveying Regulations, Perceptions and Knowledge of Research Integrity from a Hong Kong Perspective.Sara R. Jordan & Phillip W. Gray - 2012 - Developing World Bioethics 13 (3):125-137.
Scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
The role of scientific associations in promoting research integrity and deterring research misconduct: Commentary on ‘challenges in studying the effects of scientific societies on research integrity’.Melissa S. Anderson & Joseph B. Shultz - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):269-272.
Commentary on “the history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond” (c. pascal).Kenneth D. Pimple - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):203-204.
Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.James J. Dooley & Helen M. Kerch - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):109-121.
Improving biomedical journals’ ethical policies: the case of research misconduct.Xavier Bosch - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (9):644-646.
Scientific societies and research integrity: What are they doing and how well are they doing it?Margot Iverson, Mark S. Frankel & Sanyin Siang - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):141-158.
Commentary on 'developing a federal policy on research misconduct' (s. francis).Kenneth J. Ryan - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):273-274.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
14 (#983,112)

6 months
2 (#1,193,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references