A randomized, controlled, equivalence study of authorized versus non-authorized deception in a model of pain following third molar extraction

Clinical Ethics 15 (2):104-110 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Background and rationaleWhen deception is used, a conflict ensues between the need to use it to answer a research question scientifically whilst protecting the participants’ autonomy simultaneously...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Varieties of self-deception.Robert F. Bornstein - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):108-109.
Psychology and Politics: Lies, Damned Lies and Self-Deception.K. V. Wilkes - 1994 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 37:115-.
Self-deception vs. self-caused deception: A comment on professor Mele.Robert Audi - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):104-104.
Distal versus proximal mechanisms of “real” self-deception.Joan S. Lockard - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):120-121.
Understanding and explaining real self-deception.Alfred R. Mele - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):127-134.
A confederate's perspective on deception.Adam Oliansky - 1991 - Ethics and Behavior 1 (4):253 – 258.
The philosophy of deception.Clancy W. Martin (ed.) - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Self-deception and self-knowledge.Jordi Fernández - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (2):379-400.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-25

Downloads
20 (#764,377)

6 months
13 (#191,601)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?