Aristotle's Two Systems

Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this study, Daniel W. Graham addresses two major problems in interpreting Aristotle. First, should we reconcile the apparent inconsistencies of the corpus by assuming an underlying unity of doctrine, or by positing a sequence of developing ideas? Secondly,what is the relation between the so-called logical works on the one hand and the physical-metaphysical treatises on the other? Although the problems appear to be unrelated, Graham finds that the key to the first lies in the second, and in doing so provides the first major alternative to theunitarian approach since Jaeger's pioneering developmental study of 1923.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Chapters

S1: Atomic Substantialism

S1 is the doctrine of the Organon plus the Rhetoric and S2 are the remaining treatises of Aristotle. This chapter argues that S1 embodies a philosophical system. It also outlines the ontology, logic, and philosophy of science of S1 to which emerges a system of interrelated explanatory sche... see more

S2: Hylomorphic Substantialism

This chapter argues that current accounts of Aristotle often present S2 theory contaminated by doctrines imported from S1. It examines the ontology, theory of logic and language, and philosophy of science of S2. The feature that seems to be most distinctive of this ontology as contrasted w... see more

The Growth of S2: Potentiality and Actuality

This chapter presents theories that were peripheral to S1 and states that they were transformed under the pressure of new principles to become key components of a new system. Since the important stages in the development of Aristotle's two theories correlates with the changeover to S2, thi... see more

The Paradoxes of Substance: Matter

This chapter tries to answer the question how did Aristotle see the relation between S1 and S2, and argues that he did not abandon S1. An interpretation of Aristotle's Metaphysics vii in this chapter purports not to find the real solution to the problem of substance but to show that there ... see more

Similar books and articles

Aristotle’s Two Systems.Daniel W. Graham - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Daniel W. Graham, "Aristotle's Two Systems". [REVIEW]Thomas M. Olshewsky - 1990 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (3):439.
Systems of Predication. Aristotle’s Categories in Topics, I, 9.Roberto Granieri - 2016 - Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 27:1-18.
Aristotle's Two Systems.Cass Weller & Daniel W. Graham - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (2):324.
Aristotle Physics Book Viii.Daniel W. Graham (ed.) - 1999 - Clarendon Press.
Two Systems in Aristotle.”.Dw Graham - 1989 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 7:215-231.
Rejection in Łukasiewicz's and Słupecki's Sense.Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska - 2018 - In Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska & Ángel Garrido (eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School. Past and Present. Cham, Switzerland: Springer- Birkhauser,. pp. 575-597.
Aristotle.J. M. E. Moravcsik - 1967 - Garden City, N.Y.,: Anchor Books.
Review of Aristotle’s psychology. [REVIEW]James E. Faulconer - 1990 - Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 10 (1):51-53.
Systemy sylogistyki dowodowej.Piotr Kulicki - 2010 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 58 (1):139-154.
Review of Aristotle’s psychology. [REVIEW]James E. Faulconer - 1990 - Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 10 (1):51-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-13

Downloads
11 (#1,120,716)

6 months
9 (#295,942)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel W. Graham
Brigham Young University

Citations of this work

Being measured: truth and falsehood in Aristotle's Metaphysics.Mark Richard Wheeler - 2019 - Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
On the Megarians of Metaphysics IX 3.Santiago Chame - forthcoming - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references