Xenophon's Defence of Socrates: The Rhetorical Background to the Socratic Problem

Classical Quarterly 39 (1):136-140 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The death of Socrates gave birth to an industry of biographical literature which often took the form of a defence or prosecution, sometimes purporting to be the actual defence or prosecution conducted at his trial. Plato and Xenophon wrote works in his defence. Among his critics, one Polycrates had a certain notoriety. Lysias, Theodectes and Demetrius of Phalerum, orators and rhetoricians like Polycrates, were credited with further works of apology. There were doubtless many others. The aim of this paper is to show that Xenophon wrote his Defence in the light of the rhetorical theory that required that a speaker utter words and thoughts appropriate πρεποντα to his character.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Composition of Plato's Apology.Reginald Hackforth - 1933 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
Xenophon on Government.Vivienne J. Gray (ed.) - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Socrates: a life examined.Luis E. Navia - 2007 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.
On Professor VIastos’ Xenophon.Donald Morrison - 1987 - Ancient Philosophy 7:9-22.
Apologies. Plato & Xenophon - 2006 - Focus.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
12 (#1,087,411)

6 months
1 (#1,474,534)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A History of Greek Philosophy.K. W. Harrington - 1978 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (3):431-433.
Socrates, Man and Myth.Anton-Hermann Chroust - 1960 - Philosophy 35 (135):372-373.
The Literary Treatises of Dionysius of Halicarnassus.R. K. Hack & S. F. Bonner - 1944 - American Journal of Philology 65 (1):97.

Add more references