Determinism: What we have learned and what we still don't know

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to give a brief survey the implications of the theories of modern physics for the doctrine of determinism. The survey will reveal a curious feature of determinism: in some respects it is fragile, requiring a number of enabling assumptions to give it a fighting chance; but in other respects it is quite robust and very difficult to kill. The survey will also aim to show that, apart from its own intrinsic interest, determinism is an excellent device for probing the foundations of classical, relativistic, and quantum physics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Arguments for incompatibilism.Kadri Vihvelin - 2003/2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
How free are you? The determinism problem.Ted Honderich - 2001 - In Robert Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 249.
In Defense of the Smart Aleck.Richard Duble - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24:305-309.
Digging deeper into determinism.Don Locke - 1980 - Mind 89 (January):87-89.
Determinism: what we have learned and what we still don't know.John Earman - 2004 - In Joseph K. Campbell (ed.), Freedom and Determinism. Cambridge Ma: Bradford Book/Mit Press. pp. 21--46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
53 (#299,469)

6 months
2 (#1,185,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ted Honderich
University College London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references