Post-secular sociology: modes, possibilities and challenges

Approaching Religion 3 (1):4-15 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is by now well known that the modern category of religion has evolved as part of a certain trajectory of Western history. Among its many aspects, this trajectory is about how religion became part of a definitive relationship with the category of the secular – a relationship that implies an understanding of religion as something distinct – and ideally # – from other categories such as science, politics, and law. The place of the category of religion as part of this semantic as well as institutional landscape of separations makes it relevant to probe the possible consequences for sociology, if we are, as some scholars have argued, living in contexts which are increasingly post-secular. What happens, then, to the object – as well as the self-identity – of the study of religion? This article discusses some of the possible epistemological shifts inherent in the idea of a movement from secular to post-secular and it will reflect upon the possible avenues they open up for the sociological study of religion.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Living in an Age of Comfort: Understanding Religion in the Twenty-first Century.G. Melleuish - 2014 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2014 (166):9-24.
Sociology and theology reconsidered.John D. Brewer - 2007 - History of the Human Sciences 20 (2):7-28.
Sociology into Theology.Kieran Flanagan - 2008 - Theory, Culture and Society 25 (7-8):236-261.
The sociologically acceptable definition of religion.Mirko Blagojevic - 2004 - Filozofija I Društvo 2004 (25):213-240.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-08

Downloads
13 (#1,054,355)

6 months
6 (#566,625)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Adorno und Habermas im Vergleich: Vom Säkularismus zum Postsäkularismus?Karel Hlaváček - 2018 - Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics 20 (1):143-168.

Add more citations

References found in this work

We have never been modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
A Secular Age.Charles Taylor - 2007 - Harvard University Press.
Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word.Walter J. Ong - 1983 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 16 (4):270-271.
Modernity and Ambivalence.Zygmunt Bauman - 1990 - Theory, Culture and Society 7 (2-3):143-169.
The Predicament of Culture.James Clifford - 1988 - Harvard University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references