Review of Floyd and Mühlhölzer on Wittgenstein's Annotations to Hardy [Book Review]

Philosophia Mathematica (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/philmat/nkac003

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Book Review: Juliet Floyd and Felix Mühlhölzer, Wittgenstein’s Annotations to Hardy’s Course of Pure Mathematics: An Investigation of Wittgenstein’s Non-Extensionalist Understanding of the Real Numbers. [REVIEW]Kim Solin - 2021 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 10.
Juliet Floyd, Felix Mühlhölzer: Wittgenstein’s Annotations to Hardy’s Course of Pure Mathematics. An Investigation of Wittgenstein’s Non-Extensionalist Understanding of the Real Numbers. 2020.Esther Heinrich-Ramharter - 2022 - Wittgenstein-Studien 13 (1):185-190.
Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics: Felix Mühlhölzer in Conversation with Sebastian Grève.Felix Mühlhölzer - 2014 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 3 (2):151-180.
Misunderstanding gödel: New arguments about Wittgenstein and new remarks by Wittgenstein.Victor Rodych - 2003 - Dialectica 57 (3):279–313.
Misunderstanding Gödel: New Arguments about Wittgenstein and New Remarks by Wittgenstein.Victor Rodych - 2003 - Dialectica 57 (3):279-313.
Depth and Clarity * Felix Muhlholzer. Braucht die Mathematik eine Grundlegung? Eine Kommentar des Teils III von Wittgensteins Bemerkungen uber die Grundlagen der Mathematik [Does Mathematics need a Foundation? A Commentary on Part III of Wittgenstein's Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics]. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann, 2010. ISBN: 978-3-465-03667-8. Pp. xiv + 602. [REVIEW]Juliet Floyd - 2015 - Philosophia Mathematica 23 (2):255-276.
Wittgenstein’s ‘notorious paragraph’ about the Gödel Theorem.Timm Lampert - 2006 - In Lampert Timm (ed.), Contributions of the Austrian Wittgenstein Societ. pp. 168-171.
What he could have said (but did not say) about Gödel’s second theorem: A note on Floyd-Putnam’s Wittgenstein.Kaave Lajevardi - 2021 - Wittgenstein-Studien 12 (1):121-129.
Tba.Juliet Floyd - 2016 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 5 (2).
„Seltsame Frage. –“– Eine Interpretation von PU § 263.Felix Mühlhölzer - 2014 - Wittgenstein-Studien 5 (1).
Wittgenstein and the regular heptagon.Felix Mühlhölzer - 2001 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):215-247.
Teil III der Bemerkungen über die Grundlagen der Mathematik und die zugrunde liegenden Manuskripte 122 und 117. Ein Vergleich. [REVIEW]Felix Mühlhölzer - 2012 - Wittgenstein-Studien 3 (1).
Prefatory Note to the Frege-Wittgenstein Correspondence.Juliet Floyd - 2011 - In Enzo De Pellegrin (ed.), Interactive Wittgenstein. Springer. pp. 1--14.
The Frege-Wittgenstein Correspondence: Interpretive Themes.Juliet Floyd - 2011 - In Enzo De Pellegrin (ed.), Interactive Wittgenstein. Springer. pp. 75--107.
On being surprised: Wittgenstein on aspect-perception, logic, and mathematics.Juliet Floyd - 2010 - In William Day & Víctor J. Krebs (eds.), Seeing Wittgenstein Anew. Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-22

Downloads
10 (#1,184,994)

6 months
4 (#779,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Juliette Kennedy
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Frank Ramsey: A Sheer Excess of Powers.Cheryl Misak - 2020 - The Philosophers' Magazine 91:65-69.

Add more references