Graduate studies at Western
Religious Studies 41 (1):95-105 (2005)
|Abstract||Arguments by W. T. Stace and C. J. Insole show that metaphorical descriptions of God presuppose literal descriptions of God. This poses a problem for the metaphor of darkness which has often been used, for instance by Pseudo-Dionysius, in the context of negative theology and apophatic mysticism. Three strategies of dealing with the problem are discussed in this article. The negative, apophatic approach can be seen either as subverting itself, or as being restricted to certain properties, or as resting on a self-excluding principle. Whereas the first two strategies have their difficulties, self-exclusion is linguistically founded and adequate to the purposes of negative theology.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Adriaan T. Peperzak (1998). Bonaventure's Contribution to the Twentieth Century Debate on Apophatic Theology. Faith and Philosophy 15 (2):181-192.
P. X. Monaghan (2010). A Novel Interpretation of Plato's Theory of Forms. Metaphysica 11 (1):63-78.
Briggs Wright (2012). Darkness Visible? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):39 - 55.
H. M. Malm (1989). Commodification or Compensation: A Reply to Ketchum. Hypatia 4 (3):128 - 135.
Robert Batterman (1992). Quantum Chaos and Semiclassical Mechanics. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:50 - 65.
Jean-Luc Marion & Arianne Conty (2002). The Unspoken. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:39-56.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #85,965 of 731,339 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?