Russell's paradox
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2001)
| Abstract | Russell's paradox represents either of two interrelated logical antinomies. The most commonly discussed form is a contradiction arising in the logic of sets or classes. Some classes (or sets) seem to be members of themselves, while some do not. The class of all classes is itself a class, and so it seems to be in itself. The null or empty class, however, must not be a member of itself. However, suppose that we can form a class of all classes (or sets) that, like the null class, are not included in themselves. The paradox arises from asking the question of whether this class is in itself. It is if and only if it is not. The other form is a contradiction involving properties. Some properties seem to apply to themselves, while others do not. The property of being a property is itself a property, while the property of being a cat is not itself a cat. Consider the property that something has just in case it is a property (like that of being a cat ) that does not apply to itself. Does this property apply to itself? Once again, from either assumption, the opposite follows. The paradox was named after Bertrand Russell, who discovered it in 1901. | |||||||||
| Keywords | paradox Russell type theory Zermelo | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJay Newhard (2005). Grelling's Paradox. Philosophical Studies 126 (1):1 - 27.
James Levine (2001). On Russell's Vulnerability to Russell's Paradox. History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (4):207-231.
L. H. Kauffman (2012). The Russell Operator. Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):112-115.
Kevin C. Klement (2010). Russell, His Paradoxes, and Cantor's Theorem: Part I. Philosophy Compass 5 (1):16-28.
Nicholas J. J. Smith (2000). The Principle of Uniform Solution (of the Paradoxes of Self-Reference). Mind 109 (433):117-122.
Kevin C. Klement (2010). Russell, His Paradoxes, and Cantor's Theorem: Part II. Philosophy Compass 5 (1):29-41.
Kevin C. Klement (2001). Russell's Paradox in Appendix B of the Principles of Mathematics : Was Frege's Response Adequate? History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (1):13-28.
Kevin C. Klement, Russell-Myhill Paradox. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
André Fuhrmann (2002). Russell's Way Out of the Paradox of Propositions. History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (3):197-213.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads38 ( #30,956 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 549,754 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
