Nietzsche, Nishitani, and Laruelle on the Apostle Paul: tradition and the affirmation of life

Comparative and Continental Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article offers two further philosophical engagements with the writings of the Apostle Paul. The recent work of Francois Laruelle on Paul in his turn to Christian non-theology is placed in dialogue with Nishitani Keiji’s account. This effort is accomplished by briefly grounding the discussion in Friedrich Nietzsche’s interpretation, where Paul is cast as the inventor of Christianity and the primary influence in the religion’s turn to a doctrinal and world-denying form of existence. As described here, Laruelle follows the broad outline of Nietzsche’s interpretation, where Paul once more deviates from the example of Christ and is guilty of encouraging a turn away from the world towards concepts of transcendence and life after death. Nishitani, on the other hand, and despite his affection for Nietzsche’s thought, sees in Paul’s life and writings a turn towards immanence, and offers a heavily contrasting read of Paul, one which deserves greater attention.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nishitani's Nietzsche: Will to Power and the Moment.Sarah Flavel - 2015 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 46 (1):12-24.
(Non-)Human Identity and Radical Immanence: On Man-in-Person in François Laruelle's Non-Philosophy.Alex Dubilet - 2017 - In Rocco Gangle & Julius Greve (eds.), Superpositions: Laruelle and the Humanities. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International. pp. 31-45.
Harmonizing Voices: François Laruelle and Anthony Paul Smith.Anthony Paul Smith & Mark William Westmoreland - 2017 - Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics 19 (2):22-34.
Laruelle and Non-Philosophy.John Mullarkey & Anthony Paul Smith (eds.) - 2012 - Edinburgh University Press.
The Origins of Laruelle's Non-Philosophy in Ravaisson's Understanding of Metaphysics.Vincent Le - 2018 - Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics 20 (1):5-22.
Theories of the Immanent Rebellion: Non-Marxism and Non-Christianity.Katerina Kolozova - 2012 - In John Mullarkey & Anthony Paul Smith (eds.), Laruelle and Non-Philosophy. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 209-226.
2. Laruelle Facing Deleuze: Immanence, Resistance and Desire.Marjorie Gracieuse - 2012 - In John Mullarkey & Anthony Paul Smith (eds.), Laruelle and Non-Philosophy. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 42-59.
Introduction: The Non-Philosophical Inversion: Laruelle’s Knowledge Without Domination.John Mullarkey & Anthony Paul Smith - 2012 - In John Mullarkey & Anthony Paul Smith (eds.), Laruelle and Non-Philosophy. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 1-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-06

Downloads
10 (#1,187,905)

6 months
10 (#261,739)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Between identity and difference: Three ways of reading Nishida's non-dualism.Gereon Kopf - 2004 - Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 31 (1):73-103.
Ontology and utterance.Keiji Nishitani - 1981 - Philosophy East and West 31 (1):29-43.

Add more references