Responding to the Religious Reasons of Others: Resonance and Non-Reducitve Religious Pluralism

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (2):23-46 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Call a belief ‘non-negotiable’ if one cannot abandon the belief without the abandonment of one’s religious perspective. Although non-negotiable beliefs can logically exclude other perspectives, a non-reductive approach to religious pluralism can help to create a space within which the non- negotiable beliefs of others that contradict one’s own non-negotiable beliefs can be appreciated and understood as playing a justificatory role for the other. The appreciation of these beliefs through cognitive resonance plays a crucial role to enable the understanding of those who hold other perspectives. epistemological and spiritual consequences of this claim are explored.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pluralism, Religious.Michael Barnes Norton - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Transformative Experience and the Problem of Religious Disagreement.Joshua Blanchard & Laurie Paul - 2021 - In Matthew A. Benton & Jonathan L. Kvanvig (eds.), Religious Disagreement and Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 127-141.
Religious ambiguity and religious diversity.Robert McKim - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Religious Beliefs as World-View Beliefs.Winfried Löffler - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (3):7-25.
Sport, Religious Belief, and Religious Diversity.Randolph Feezell - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):135-162.
The role of religious and non-religious beliefs in medical decisions.Atsushi Asai & Yasuhiro Kadooka Aizawa - 2009 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 19 (6):162-165.
Religious Pluralism and the Rationality of Religious Belief.John Hick - 1993 - Faith and Philosophy 10 (2):242-249.
Religious Disagreement Is Not Unique.Margaret Greta Turnbull - 2021 - In Matthew A. Benton & Jonathan L. Kvanvig (eds.), Religious Disagreement and Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 90-106.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-09

Downloads
6 (#1,462,242)

6 months
3 (#978,358)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Rethinking Religious Epistemology.Amber L. Griffioen - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 14 (1):21-47.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references