What to tell? Wise communication and wise crowd

Theory and Decision 90 (2):279-299 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper investigates how communication influences people’s judgment quality in simple estimation tasks. Except for an exchange of estimates, our design also allows the exchange of supportive evidence underlying the estimates in a controlled manner. Compared with the control treatment, the exchange of estimates and supportive evidence together improves judgment quality at both the individual level and the crowd level. On the other hand, the exchange of estimates or supportive evidence separately has no impact.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is the Equal-Weight View Really Supported by Positive Crowd Effects?Christian J. Feldbacher-Escamilla - 2015 - In Uskali Mäki, Ioannis Votsis, Stephanie Ruphy & Gerhard Schurz (eds.), Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science: EPSA13 Helsinki. Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 87-98.
Wisdom and the Learning Imperative.John Rensenbrink - 2004 - Dialogue and Universalism 14 (3):199-207.
A General Theory of Authority. [REVIEW]T. B. T. J. - 1964 - Review of Metaphysics 17 (3):482-482.
Can a Wise Society Be a Free One?Margaret Gilbert - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):151-167.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-19

Downloads
12 (#1,077,824)

6 months
2 (#1,193,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references