Psalms 16, 22, and 110. Historically Interpreted as Referring to Jesus

Perichoresis 10 (2):207-221 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Psalms 16, 22, and 110. Historically Interpreted as Referring to Jesus Three Christological Psalms, 16, 22, and 110 are troublesome to modern interpreters as they are used by New Testament writers. Scholars in earlier centuries had little difficulty following the ways these psalms seemed to be counted in the New Testament as predictions of Jesus. This interpretation was continued in the Reformation but is strongly questioned by conservative and critical scholars today. The argument reviews the contextual commentary for important quotations of these psalms in the New Testament, and examines the special content of the psalms to conclude that the earlier interpreters are more trustworthy guides. The unusual New Testament usage and strange content of the psalms warrants the application of exceptional hermeneutical principles to read them properly in the biblical canon. The implications for a Christological reading of these psalms are explored for theological and practical value.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Philosophy of Jesus.Peter Kreeft - 2007 - St. Augustine's Press.
Sin, grace, and redemption in Abelard.Thomas Williams - 2004 - In Kevin Guilfoy & Jeffrey Brower (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Abelard. Cambridge University Press. pp. 258-278.
Abortion: Strong's counterexamples fail.Ezio Di Nucci - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):304-305.
Christ and the moral life.James M. Gustafson - 1968 - Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.
Understanding life.Andres Luure - 2002 - Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):315-325.
Jesus and philosophy: On the questions we ask.Paul K. Moser - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (3):261-283.
A Posteriori Arguments for the Trinity.Richard Swinburne - 2013 - Studia Neoaristotelica 10 (1):13-27.
Could Kant’s Jesus Be God?Stephen R. Palmquist - 2012 - International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (4):421-437.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
3 (#1,708,708)

6 months
1 (#1,464,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references