Biology as a new media for art: An art research endeavour

Technoetic Arts 13 (1-2):115-123 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Throughout art history, numerous artists have explored connections to science. In the society of today, the relationship between art and biology has been acquiring special visibility. Moreover, the current importance given to science and technology by today’s public opinion directly drives an increased awareness about the relationship between art and science. The public has been eagerly following breakthroughs in scientific research, albeit with mixed feelings: simultaneously awe, hope and fear for its potential misuse. Such awareness about biological sciences and biotechnology has been having an increasing influence over artists, where the artist is no longer a mere observer of the scientific research and not quite a science researcher, but rather an art researcher. This particular position has led to the development of strategies to promote the exploration of possibilities deriving from a cross-talk between artists and scientists. This is a new art practice, based on a ‘risk-based’ situation; a timeless research strategy to develop new methods of practice, new media and new ways to manipulate materials for artistic expression. This is art research. During the twentieth century, the key scientific advances – such as the discovery of the DNA structure, in vitro fertilization, transgenesis or the sequencing of the human genome (in the twenty-first century) – were perceived by society in diverse ways. The progressive incorporation of those concepts by society itself led to a point where biology and the medical sciences became the most promising areas of science. It is therefore not surprising that those same scientific disciplines have marked the development of the artistic discourse in a tremendous fashion, as well as also influencing all other areas of the contemporary society. Furthermore, these artworks explore new media, described as ‘moist’ in that they integrate dry in silico computer components with wet living biological systems.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Media.Arjen Mulder - 2006 - Theory, Culture and Society 23 (2-3):289-296.
Complexity and educational research: A critical reflection.Lesley Kuhn - 2008 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (1):177–189.
Do the Media Fail to Represent Reality? It Depends.M. R. Herbers - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):155-156.
Why We Need a Pragmatic View on Reality and the Media.M. Maurer - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (1):152-153.
Media ethics.Chris Hackley - 1999 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 8 (2):134–137.
Media ethics on a higher order of magnitude.Clifford G. Christians - 2008 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 23 (1):3 – 14.
Ethics of Experimental Research.H. G. Burström - 1975 - Dialectica 29 (4):237-247.
Administration of Justice and Multimodality in Media: Semiotic Translation, Conflict and Compatibility. [REVIEW]Le Cheng - 2011 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 24 (4):491-502.
An informal agenda for media ethicists.Jay Black - 2008 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 23 (1):28 – 35.
Collective phenomena and the neglect of molecules: A historical outlook on biology.U. Deichmann - 2007 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 29 (1):83-86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-04

Downloads
15 (#946,138)

6 months
2 (#1,196,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references