David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 135 (2):193 - 213 (2003)
Framing is the least well-developed central concept of prospect theory. Framing is both fundamental to prospect theory and remarkably underdeveloped in the prospect theory literature. This paper focuses on the many subtypes and variations of framing: thematic vs. evaluative; successful vs. failed; productive vs. counterproductive; purposeful, structural and interactive framing; counterframing; loss frames vs. gain frames; revolving framing vs. sequential framing; framing by a third party; and framing vs. priming. The bulk of the paper provides an analysis of framing and framing effects in foreign policy settings with an emphasis on U.S. foreign policy. We highlight framing effects during the Cold War, the Persian Gulf War, the current ``war on terrorism'', and other IR/foreign policy settings. Our examination highlights the extent to which presidents and other significant world leaders use framing to shape policy debates and national security choices.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Epistemology Logic Metaphysics Philosophy of Language|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Keith E. Stanovich Richard & F. West (1998). Individual Differences in Framing and Conjunction Effects. Thinking and Reasoning 4 (4):289 – 317.
S. O. Kimbrough (2011). On the Production and Ramification of Cooperation: The Cooperation Afforder with Framing Hypothesis. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (1):111-136.
Alan E. Singer, Steven Lysonski, Ming Singer & David Hayes (1991). Ethical Myopia: The Case of “Framing” by Framing. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (1):29 - 36.
Martin Peterson (2004). Transformative Decision Rules, Permutability, and Non-Sequential Framing of Decision Problems. Synthese 139 (3):387-403.
John Maule & Gaëlle Villejoubert (2007). What Lies Beneath: Reframing Framing Effects. Thinking and Reasoning 13 (1):25 – 44.
Amber N. Bloomfield, Josh A. Sager, Daniel M. Bartels & Douglas L. Medin (2006). Caring About Framing Effects. Mind and Society 5 (2):123-138.
B. Skyrms & K. J. S. Zollman (2010). Evolutionary Considerations in the Framing of Social Norms. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (3):265-273.
Michael Kohlhase & Andrea Kohlhase, Spreadsheet Interaction with Frames: Exploring a Mathematical Practice.
Jason Hanna (2011). Consent and the Problem of Framing Effects. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):517-531.
Connie Rae Bateman, John Paul Fraedrich & Rajesh Iyer (2002). Framing Effects Within the Ethical Decision Making Process of Consumers. Journal of Business Ethics 36 (1-2):119 - 140.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #100,507 of 1,789,999 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #318,432 of 1,789,999 )
How can I increase my downloads?