- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Heuristics can produce surprisingly rational probability estimates: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014)
Psychological Review 123 (1):103-111 (2016)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Surprisingly rational: Probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.Fintan Costello & Paul Watts - 2014 - Psychological Review 121 (3):463-480.
Probability theory plus noise: Replies to Crupi and Tentori (2016) and to Nilsson, Juslin, and Winman (2016).Fintan Costello & Paul Watts - 2016 - Psychological Review 123 (1):112-123.
Noisy probability judgment, the conjunction fallacy, and rationality: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014).Vincenzo Crupi & Katya Tentori - 2016 - Psychological Review 123 (1):97-102.
Probability theory, not the very guide of life.Peter Juslin, Håkan Nilsson & Anders Winman - 2009 - Psychological Review 116 (4):856-874.
Assessing Uncertainty.Amos Tversky - 1974 - Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B 36 (2):148-159.
Heuristics in technoscientific thinking.Michael E. Gorman - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):752-752.
Rationality, logic, and fast and frugal heuristics.José Luis Bermúdez - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):744-745.
The limits of probability modelling: A serendipitous tale of goldfish, transfinite numbers, and pieces of string. [REVIEW]Ranald R. Macdonald - 2000 - Mind and Society 1 (2):17-38.
The role of ANS acuity and numeracy for the calibration and the coherence of subjective probability judgments.Anders Winman, Peter Juslin, Marcus Lindskog, HÃ¥kan Nilsson & Neda Kerimi - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Probability and choice in the selection task.David W. Green, David E. Over & Robin A. Pyne - 1997 - Thinking and Reasoning 3 (3):209-235.
Calibration.Paul Weirich - 2009 - In Henk W. de Regt (ed.), Epsa Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer. pp. 415--425.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
28 (#565,245)
6 months
7 (#419,552)
2016-06-30
Downloads
28 (#565,245)
6 months
7 (#419,552)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Can conditionals explain explanations? A modus ponens model of B because A.Simone Sebben & Johannes Ullrich - 2021 - Cognition 215 (C):104812.
Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models.Fintan Costello, Paul Watts & Christopher Fisher - 2018 - Cognition 170 (C):280-297.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-659b74868d-vwmnd uwo