¿Es correcta la división aristotélica de los predicables?

Anuario Filosófico 35 (72):165-182 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the Middle Age it was tried to show that índex of five predicables that Porfirio proposes in Isagoge was suitable and complete. More recently it is affirmed that chis índex is incomplete, and thal can add a new predicable that also Aristotle would have considered: the accidents per se

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

La lógica aristotélica de los predicables.José Miguel Gambra - 1988 - Anuario Filosófico 21 (2):89-118.
Aristotle's Doctrine Of Predicables And Porphyry's Isagoge.Christos Evangeliou - 1985 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (1):15-34.
División, definición y diferencia en los "Tópicos".Andrea Falcon - 2002 - Anuario Filosófico 35 (73):297-312.
Aristotle's doctrine of predicables and Porphyry's.Christos Evangeliou - 1985 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (1):15-34.
On Truth-A Reply To C J F Williams.O. R. Jones - 1970 - Analysis 31 (October):24-29.
What Are the Predicables.John J. Toohey - 1936 - New Scholasticism 10 (3):255-265.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
11 (#1,138,639)

6 months
9 (#309,376)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references