Heidegger’s Reading of Aristotle’s Concept of Pathos

Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (2):389-406 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper takes as its point of departure the recent publication of Heidegger’s lecture course Basic Concepts of Aristotelian Philosophy and focuses upon Heidegger’s reading of Aristotle’s concept of pathos. Through a comparative analysis of Aristotle’s concept of pathos and Heidegger’s inventive reading of this concept, I aim to show the strengths and weaknesses of Heidegger’s reading. It is my thesis that Heidegger’s account is extremely rich and innovative as he frees up pathos from the narrow confines of psychology and incidental change and places it squarely into the center of the fundamental changes affecting a living being’s existence; simultaneously, however, Heidegger sometimes overstates the ties that pathos has with other concepts such as ousia and logos and highlights exceptional rather than common meanings of pathos, thereby risking the charge of being unfaithful to Aristotle’s text.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Heidegger, Luther, and Aristotle.Vishwa Adluri - 2013 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (1):129-160.
Logos as Kinesis.Charlotta Weigelt - 2004 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (1):101-116.
Logos as Kinesis.Charlotta Weigelt - 2004 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (1):101-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-18

Downloads
60 (#268,875)

6 months
19 (#136,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marjolein Oele
University of San Francisco

Citations of this work

Recognition in Blue.Maurice Charland - 2015 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 48 (4):583-600.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references