Understanding the Scientific Creativity Based on Various Perspectives of Science

Axiomathes 32 (6):907-929 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The objective of our study is to explore scientific creativity with a focus on intellectual (thinking) skills in the cognitive aspect by analyzing scientific theories, which are basically the creativity of historical great scientists, Galileo, Newton, Einstein While our study laid stress on the cognitive domain, exploration of the creativity of great scientists is also connected with affective characteristics (motives, task commitment, etc.) and their environmental factors (incubation period). Great scientists of the science history were aware of the discrepancy issue among different fields of study and long searched for solutions, which they held in their minds. As a result, they created a certain hypothesis using the abstraction strategy in which they leave only the considerations suitable for the world view of the time. Then, they conducted a thought experiment that justified it. The reason why it was difficult for general people to understand was that there was a domain transition beyond materials obtained in the abstraction process. Furthermore, they all had strong motives for the future as well as task commitment. Knowledge is a product of natural selection, and the fusion of knowledge that does not presuppose the unity of knowledge is meaningless.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moral creativity in science and engineering.Mike W. Martin - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3):421-433.
How to Foster Scientists' Creativity.Seungbae Park - 2016 - Creativity Studies 9 (2):117-126.
Science as Structured Imagination.Helen De Cruz & Johan De Smedt - 2010 - Journal of Creative Behavior 44 (1):29-44.
SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING-VIEWS FROM PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE. David-Rus - 2012 - Revue Roumaine de Philosophie 56 (2).
Creativity and Discovery.Matti Sintonen - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 4:239-247.
Visualization as a Tool for Understanding.Henk W. de Regt - 2014 - Perspectives on Science 22 (3):377-396.
Puchtas und Jherings Beiträge zur heutigen Theorie der Rechtswissenschaft.Christoph-Eric Mecke - 2009 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 95 (4):540-562.
The Illusion of Depth of Understanding in Science.Petri Ylikoski - 2009 - In Henk De Regt, Sabina Leonelli & Kai Eigner (eds.), Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 100--119.
Scientific progress: Knowledge versus understanding.Finnur Dellsén - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56 (C):72-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-26

Downloads
9 (#1,249,590)

6 months
2 (#1,188,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What Is This Thing Called Science?A. F. Chalmers - 1979 - Erkenntnis 14 (3):393-404.
The associative basis of the creative process.Sarnoff Mednick - 1962 - Psychological Review 69 (3):220-232.
Climbing Mount Improbable.Richard Dawkins - 1999 - Environmental Values 8 (1):114-116.

View all 12 references / Add more references