Graduate studies at Western
Ratio Juris 23 (1):123-156 (2010)
|Abstract||In this paper I set out to read Hägerström through his own eyes, adhering to the terminology he uses in his own original work and attempting to make sense of the variance and uniformity alike that one finds in his linguistic usage. The translations we have of Hägerström's works are quite liberal, using the same word in English where the original uses different ones, and, vice versa, using different words in English where the original uses a single one in different contexts. These misleading translations of Hägerström have contributed in some measure to Hägerström's reputation for obscurity. Further, and most importantly, I will take seriously what Hägerström says about his own thought, namely, that it is dependent on that of Kant and independent of the currents of thought contemporary with Hägerström. In Section 1 , I will briefly take up the problem of consciousness that Hägerström proceeds from, and will recall something that Bertrand Russell once said, in 1928, in regard to the revolt staged in the early 20th century in Europe against German idealism. In Sections 2 and 4.1 , I will instead take up Kant for the purpose of clarifying Hägerström's theory of judgment as treated in Section 3 . In Section 4.2 , I will illustrate the difference between the notions of nothing, R-reality, and W-reality in Hägerström. In Sections 5 and 6 , I will examine the analysis that Hägerström offers of the principle of contradiction, and will summarize the three types of judgment he singled out, including the type he called impossible judgment (or, in my own words, pseudojudgment). In Section 7 , I will consider Hägerström views as grounding, in a transcendental way, the presupposition of the primacy of the external spatio-temporal world, a world independent of our representations: I will consider in particular the W-real complexes that are merely represented, as well as the spatio-temporal world as the only W-real complex that is not merely represented. Finally, in Section 8 , I will briefly consider some of those who have commented and translated Hägerström, this to conclude that R-reality and W-reality are coextensive but not synonymous.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
D. Z. Phillips (1965). Philosophy and Religion. By Axel Hagerstrom. (Allen and Unwin. 1964. Pp. 320. Price 45s.). Philosophy 40 (153):257-.
Enrico Pattaro (2009). From Hägerström to Ross and Hart. Ratio Juris 22 (4):532-548.
Axel Hägerström (1946). Erkenntnistheoretische Vorausseteungen der spezieilen. Relativitätstheorie Einsteins. Theoria 12 (1-2):1-68.
Axel Hägerström (1935). Begreppet viljeförklaring på privaträttens område. Theoria 1 (1-2):121-138.
Einar Tegen (1939). Axel Hägerström 6/9 1868 - 7/7 1939. Theoria 5 (3):229-232.
Axel Hägerström (1948). Lectures on so-Called Spiritual Religion. Theoria 14 (1):28-67.
Bo Petersson (2011). A Real Mind. The Life and Work of Axel Hägerström – By Patricia Mindus. Theoria 77 (1):90-99.
Martin Fries (1945). Der Wirklichkeitsbegriff nach Hägerström (Verklighetsbegreppet enligt Hagerstrom). Antwort auf Anders Wedbergs Besprechung des Buches mit dem obigen Titel (Theoria X, 250-52). [REVIEW] Theoria 11 (1):71-74.
John Arthur Passmore (1961). Hägerström's Philosophy of Law. Philosophy 36 (137):143 - 160.
Bo Petersson (2011). Axel Hägerström and His Early Version of Error Theory. Theoria 77 (1):55-70.
Added to index2010-02-23
Total downloads9 ( #122,488 of 739,328 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,328 )
How can I increase my downloads?