Alternative agents for humanitarian intervention

Journal of Global Ethics 6 (3):323-338 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The use of private security companies by national governments is met with widespread skepticism. Less understood is the role these companies can play in international humanitarian interventions in the service of international organizations. I argue here that despite valid concerns about the use of such private entities, we should nonetheless see them as legitimate participants in efforts to secure human rights protection around the globe. In order to assess their legitimacy, we need to ensure, among other things, that they can adhere to ethical standards when serving in humanitarian missions, that they can be held accountable when they fail to uphold the standard of justice enshrined in international law, and that their for-profit status does not have implications detrimental to humanitarian concerns.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Eight Principles for Humanitarian Intervention.Fernando R. Tesón - 2006 - Journal of Military Ethics 5 (2):93-113.
Unauthorized humanitarian intervention.Mark S. Stein - 2004 - Social Philosophy and Policy 21 (1):14-38.
Humanitarian intervention: Which way forward?Richard Caplan - 2000 - Ethics and International Affairs 14:23–38.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-04

Downloads
33 (#480,194)

6 months
6 (#508,473)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references