Scotus on Intuitive and Abstractive Cognition

In Jeffrey P. Hause (ed.), Medieval Philosophy: Essential Readings and Contemporary Responses. London: Routledge. pp. 348-365 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How should we understand intuitive cognition? Duns Scotus held that we have intuitive cognition only when objects cause our knowledge without any causal intermediary; if an intelligible species caused our knowledge, it would be abstractive cognition. Compared to abstractive cognition, intuitive cognition is the paradigmatic case of knowledge; by contrast, abstractive cognition is only a "second best."

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Duns Scotus’s Theory of Cognition.Richard Cross - 2014 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Ockham's Misunderstood Theory of Intuitive and Abstractive Cognition.Elizabeth Karger - 1999 - In P. V. Spade (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ockham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 204--226.
Saint Bonaventure and Angelic Natural Knowledge of Singulars.Timothy B. Noone - 2011 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (1):143-159.
Intuitive and abstractive cognition.John Boler - 1982 - In Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 460--478.
Human Action in Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, and William of Ockham.Thomas M. Osborne - 2014 - Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-03

Downloads
1 (#1,895,134)

6 months
1 (#1,491,286)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Giorgio Pini
Fordham University

Citations of this work

Peter auriol.Russell L. Friedman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references