When politics trump argumentation: Financial literacy education policy

Abstract

This paper analyzes a corpus of political rhetoric to identify the rationale for Ontario’s financial literacy education policy decisions that came about in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis. The complex politics of FLE were shaped and legitimized by special-interest coalitions’ mobilization of power, characterized by unsubstantiated claims about its efficacy. The rhetoric amounted to ‘truthiness’ over argumentation through the neglect of empirical evidence.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Economic Policy and the Financial Crisis: An Empirical Analysis of What Went Wrong.John B. Taylor - 2009 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 21 (2-3):341-364.
Fiinancial Stability and Reform of the Financial System.Juraj Sipko - 2012 - Creative and Knowledge Society 2 (2):58-69.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
9 (#1,279,545)

6 months
5 (#710,905)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations