- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Normal science and its dangers
In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 51--8 (1970)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Post-normal science, the precautionary principle and the ethics of integrity.Laura Westra - 1997 - Foundations of Science 2 (2):237-262.
Normal science and the extension of theories.Jack C. Carloye - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):241-256.
Falsificationism and the structure of theories: the Popper–Kuhn controversy about the rationality of normal science.Jose Díez - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (3):543-554.
Supercompact cardinals, trees of normal ultrafilters, and the partition property.Julius B. Barbanel - 1986 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (3):701-708.
Normal monomodal logics can simulate all others.Marcus Kracht & Frank Wolter - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):99-138.
Simulation and transfer results in modal logic – a survey.Marcus Kracht & Frank Wolter - 1997 - Studia Logica 59 (2):149-177.
Some dangers connected with mathematical applications.James K. Senior - 1937 - Philosophy of Science 4 (2):168-172.
Theoretical Dangers: The FBI Investigations of "Science & Society".David H. Price - 2004 - Science and Society 68 (4):475 - 482.
Ducks, Rabbits, and Normal Science: Recasting the Kuhn’s-Eye View of Popper’s Demarcation of Science.Deborah G. Mayo - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (2):271-290.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-08-21
Downloads
355 (#56,863)
6 months
24 (#116,937)
2009-08-21
Downloads
355 (#56,863)
6 months
24 (#116,937)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Kuhn vs. Popper on criticism and dogmatism in science: a resolution at the group level.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - unknown
Kuhn vs. Popper on Criticism and Dogmatism in Science: A Resolution at the Group Level.Darrell Patrick Rowbottom - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (1):117-124.
Epistemic Equality: Distributive Epistemic Justice in the Context of Justification.Boaz Miller & Meital Pinto - 2022 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 32 (2):173-203.
Hinges, Disagreements, and Arguments: (Rationally) Believing Hinge Propositions and Arguing across Deep Disagreements.Harvey Siegel - 2019 - Topoi 40 (5):1107-1116.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-b9rvg uwo